<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Announce Improved Flash Indexing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reversedelta.com/blog/webnews/google-announce-improved-flash-indexing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reversedelta.com/info/blog/internet-marketing/google-announce-improved-flash-indexing</link>
	<description>Recruitment Website Design, SEO, Web Design &#38; Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 08:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Haygarth</title>
		<link>http://www.reversedelta.com/info/blog/internet-marketing/google-announce-improved-flash-indexing#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Haygarth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 08:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reversedelta.co.uk/blog/?p=88#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Interested - I&#039;d love to see how this pans out in the long term.
The challenge of optimising Flash sites to make text content indexed is a classic argument for using CSS to hide divs - sections of text - that are visible to search engines but not &#039;humans&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interested &#8211; I&#8217;d love to see how this pans out in the long term.<br />
The challenge of optimising Flash sites to make text content indexed is a classic argument for using CSS to hide divs &#8211; sections of text &#8211; that are visible to search engines but not &#8216;humans&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

